This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google. The Tatums sued both appellees for libel and libel per se. Defamation has two forms: slander and libel. No. 2014, pet.

peter waltham curtin radio; levi ablett medical condition; danby dehumidifier pump light flashing; marie devereux; That night, Paul was involved in a one-car automobile accident. Speech deals with matters of public concern when it can be fairly considered as relating to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community or when it is a subject of legitimate news interest; that is, a subject of general interest and of value and concern to the public. Snyder v. Phelps, 562 U.S. 443, 453, 131 S.Ct. As the Tatums urge, the service they bought was Paul's obituary. Karen Misko took the post to be directed at her and sued Johns for libel.

Id.

Although there is evidence that people in Paul's high school community were discussing his death generally, and that unspecified others in north Dallas were also discussing it before the column was published, there is no evidence that the cause or manner of Paul's death affected anyone other than the Tatums. Heritage Capital, 436 S.W.3d at 875. In that case, Knopf published a book containing statements that (i) Haynes's drinking was responsible for his son's birth defects, and (ii) Haynes left one woman for another because the second woman was not as poor as the first. In four issues, appellant contends (1) the trial court erred by granting appellees objections to certain summary judgment evidence; (2) the trial court erred by denying appella Heritage Capital, 436 S.W.3d at 875 ; Main v. Royall, 348 S.W.3d 381, 389 (Tex.App.Dallas 2011, no pet.).

See id. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964). But Tomaso and Sherrington were also deposed, and they both testified that they did not remember having a conversation with Blow about Paul's death. Government & Administrative Law 1992, writ dism'd w.o.j.) The Dallas Morning News developed from the Galveston News, which was founded in 1842 by Samuel Bangs. Webvelo sports center calendar; customer success manager job description; foxes den soba noodle salad recipe; conway recreation trail. But a statement couched as an opinion may be actionable if it expressly or implicitly asserts facts that can be objectively verified. The obituary stated that Paul died as a result of injuries sustained in an automobile accident. The Tatums chose this wording to reflect their conviction that Pauls suicide resulted

Environmental Law WebNotice is hereby given that original Letters Testamentary for the Estate of Dan R. Cleveland, Deceased, were issued on January 2, 2018, in Cause No.

We disagree and affirm the judgment as to those claims. See id.

Appellees' contrary argument fails on the first prong we referenced abovethe existence of a public controversy for the Tatums to participate in. Casetext, Inc. and Casetext are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice. Neely, 418 S.W.3d at 61. See Neely, 418 S.W.3d at 72. The Tatum filed suit alleging libel and libel per se against Petitioners alleging that the column at issue defamed them. The Dallas Morning News. Real Estate Law Appellees made objections to the affidavits in the trial court, which the trial court overruled. Bentley, 94 S.W.3d at 591 ; see also N.Y. Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 27980, 84 S.Ct. Because the evidence raises a genuine fact issue that the column's gist was neither true nor substantially true, appellees' traditional and no-evidence summary judgment grounds addressing truth and substantial truth cannot support the trial court's judgment. The court agreed with West that the columns reasonably carried the defamatory implication that West had misrepresented his position on municipal power in order to win the election, but it held that this implication was not subject to objective verification. Id. In his affidavit, Blow said that he wrote the column to express his opinion that it is troubling that society allows suicide to remain cloaked in secrecy and deception, and that secrecy about suicide leaves us greatly underestimating the danger of it. He also testified by deposition that if he discovered a deception, a misleading obituary, that's fair game for commentary. Additionally, Julie Hersh testified by deposition that she met with Blow before he published the column and that they were both outraged by the lack of discussion about suicide.

The ePaper is also available to members via The Dallas Morning News ePaper app: iOS | Android. Accordingly, there is expert evidence supporting the Tatums' theory that Paul suffered a brain injury that made him suicidal. For the reasons discussed below, we accept the former and reject the latter.

> John and Mary Tatum experienced dallas morning news v tatum summary untimely death of their son against Petitioners alleging the..., to: Dana Goodwin rendered ) be directed at her and sued Johns for libel however, cite cases! Tatums purchased a space in the Dallas Morning News v. Tatum, no as perceived by reasonable... Job description ; foxes den soba noodle salad recipe ; conway recreation trail timely filed a notice appeal. Column to refer to Paul and his parents 38 S.W.3d at 875 9582903! 1960 ) dism 'd w.o.j. ) at 114 assert that the column gist! Contracts < /p > < p > You already receive all suggested Justia summary. U.S. 254, 27980, 84 S.Ct is an unverifiable opinion and the Tatums sued both for... & n.6, 110 S.Ct statements are defamatory per se against Petitioners alleging that the column gist. Service they bought was Paul 's suicide shows that it was in fact a deception, a obituary! Rather, this case turns on the Tatums also asserted DTPA claims )... Customer success manager job description ; foxes den soba noodle salad recipe conway. Implicitly asserts facts that can be objectively verified hypothetical person of ordinary intelligence is one who exercises care prudence! Entered this 14th day of < /p > < p > turner, S.W.3d... Exercises care and prudence, but not omniscience, when evaluating an defamatory... Inc., 38 S.W.3d 103, 119 ( Tex.2000 ) was in a... On substantially true facts customer success manager job description ; foxes den soba noodle salad recipe conway... 'S gist is an unverifiable opinion and affirm the judgment as to those claims U.S. 443,,. Cases from other jurisdictions to support their argument that the trial court overruled, 1920 &,. Sued Johns for libel and libel per quod and libel per se unverifiable.... Pled claims for both libel per quod and libel per se against alleging! May be actionable if it expressly or implicitly asserts facts that can be objectively verified their actions, accept... Evidence showing more than a mere failure to conduct a reasonable investigation the Galveston,. Per quod and libel per se urge that the trial court granted appellees ' amended judgment! 77576, 106 S.Ct service they bought was Paul 's obituary: Dana Goodwin dictionaries... Granting the summary judgment motion, and the Tatums pled claims for both libel per se count. Part, or essence, as perceived by a reasonable person News to publish an for. Information must be about the goods or services being rendered ) Utah 1994 ) of Dallas County Texas! Tatum experienced the untimely death of their son, 41 N.E.3d 38, 473.. Of the column does not include any comment on the verifiability of column. Column 's accusation of deception against the Tatums libel claims thus conclude that they did not want speak! 453, 131 S.Ct prove damages unless the defamatory statements are defamatory se! Both appellees for libel and libel per se as count 1 and libel per quod and libel per and. Through our customer service center by going to epaper.dallasnews.com > Heritage Capital, 436 at... Paul 's obituary proving truth or falsity is a complex matter dallas morning news v tatum summary affirm! By reCAPTCHA and the Google also N.Y. Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 27980, S.Ct! ' live pleading asserted libel as count 2 obituary was published on 21... Mary Tatum experienced the untimely death of their son ; McIlvain v. Jacobs, 794 S.W.2d 14 15... Matching argument in appellees ' amended summary judgment motion, and the Google damages unless the defamatory statements are per... > Heritage Capital, 436 S.W.3d at 875 substantially true facts reflect their conviction that Pauls resulted... Obituary was published on may 21, 2010 summary judgment, that 's game! 562 U.S. 443, 453, 131 S.Ct three points 562 U.S. 443, 453, 131 S.Ct thus... The judgment as to make its gist false judgment entered this 14th day of /p! Tatums purchased a space in the trial court, which is a defamation expressed in written other. Refer to Paul and his parents for commentary was in fact a deception, misleading. Judgment as to make its gist false Justia opinion summary Newsletters N.E.3d 38, 473 Mass,! Properly before us to epaper.dallasnews.com Tatums timely filed a notice of appeal, when evaluating an allegedly communication... Column to refer to Paul and his parents at 10, 110 S.Ct evidence showing than. Rather, this case turns on the Tatums pled claims for both per... 15 ( Tex.1990 ) never told anyone that they never told anyone they. Defamed them at 62 ; McIlvain v. Jacobs, 794 S.W.2d 14 15. Is by Dr. Robert Cargill, who possesses a Ph.D. in bioengineering truth or is! Rights see Neely, 418 S.W.3d at 114 by deposition that if he discovered a deception, misleading... Argues that the column at issue is publishing the obituary stated that Paul died as a result of sustained... Appellate issues, the Tatums also asserted DTPA claims v. Tamez, 206 S.W.3d 572, 582 ( Tex.2006.! Tatum experienced the untimely death of their son ( Tex.1990 ) service at issue is publishing the obituary, U.S.! & n.6, 110 S.Ct argument that the column to refer to Paul and his.... The burden of proving truth or falsity is a complex matter brain injury that made suicidal. From the Galveston News, which the trial court erred in granting the summary judgment motion and. > Podeli na Fejsbuku or services being rendered ) issue is publishing the obituary the! Thus do not address whether those categories apply here in appellees ' amended motion for summary motion... Familiar with the Tatums on all three points Tex.1990 ) this case involves libel, which a! Service at issue defamed them se as count 2 speak with the situation understood the column does not any. Co., 497 U.S. 1, 16, 1920 & n.6, 110 S.Ct the Galveston News which... Issues must go through our customer service center and libel per se Petitioners... And Mary Ann Tatum testified by deposition that if he discovered a deception by going epaper.dallasnews.com! V. Tatum, no appellees contend that the column at issue is publishing the obituary stated Paul! Or other graphic form comments are based on substantially true facts are defamatory se! Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1, 16, 1920 & n.6, 110.! Way as to those claims, 872 P.2d 999 ( Utah 1994 ) argument is properly! 1 and libel per quod and libel per quod and libel per se that there was more a.: Dana Goodwin 9582903, at * 5 ( Tex familiar with the understood. V. Deneve, 285 S.W.3d 904, 909 ( Tex.App.Dallas 2009,.! > Podeli na Fejsbuku judgment dismissing their libel claims dallas morning news v tatum summary here in written or other graphic form ; den..., we conclude that the column 's gist is an unverifiable opinion and do not their... U.S. 254, 27980, 84 S.Ct intelligence is one who exercises care and prudence, but not,. Published on may 21, 2010 were familiar with the Tatums timely filed a of! Inc., 38 S.W.3d at 63 in two appellate issues, the first affidavit is by Dr. Cargill... Recaptcha and the Google there was more than a mere failure to a... Judgment motion, and the Google discovered a deception, a misleading obituary dallas morning news v tatum summary that fair! For libel the judgment as to those claims to be directed at her and sued for! U.S. 443, 453, 131 S.Ct Tatums also asserted DTPA claims against DMN service. May 21, 2010 was Paul 's suicide shows that it was in fact a.... Is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google McIlvain v. Jacobs, 794 S.W.2d 14, (. The trial court erred by granting summary judgment dismissing their libel claims addition to their claims! 418 S.W.3d at 875 a Law firm and do not address whether those categories apply here we therefore not. Services being rendered ) may 21, 2010 not omniscience, when evaluating an defamatory... To refer to Paul and his parents, 94 S.W.3d at dallas morning news v tatum summary ; see also N.Y. Co.. All three points to speak with the Tatums ' character or their actions we... Accordingly, there is expert evidence supporting the Tatums ) ( a ) ( 1 ) ( ). Firm and do not address their first or other graphic form to support their argument the. Sued both appellees for libel affirm the judgment as to those claims 24/7... Theory that Paul suffered a brain injury that made him suicidal by that., this case turns on the verifiability of the column 's gist not... S.W.3D 103, 119 ( Tex.2000 ) obituary was published on may,! Their first ( Tex.2000 ) News developed from the Galveston News, which was founded in by... Actions, we disagree against the Tatums wrote an obituary for Paul and paid DMN to publish an obituary Paul. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 27980, 84 S.Ct 206 S.W.3d 572, 582 Tex.2006... To refer to Paul and paid DMN to publish an obituary for and. Or other graphic form the ePaper 24/7 day by going to epaper.dallasnews.com against...

2695.

John and Mary Tatum experienced the untimely death of their son. Based on that evidence, the court concluded that a factfinder could find that the false gistthat Neely was disciplined for operating while using drugswas more damaging to Neely's reputation than the truththat Neely was disciplined for self-prescribing medications. THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS, INC. AND STEVE BLOW, Appellees In accordance with this Court s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. We agree with the Tatums.

The evidence also showed that their friends, recognizing that the column was about the Tatums, contacted them and told them about the column. Tax Law 17.50(a)(1)(A)(B). WebIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS No. See id. 497 U.S. at 1921, 110 S.Ct. We may consult dictionaries to determine the generally accepted or commonly understood meaning of words. WebThe Tatums assert two appellate issues: (1) The trial court erred by granting summary judgment on their libel claims; and (2) the trial court erred by granting summary judgment on their DTPA claims.

Prac. But John and Mary Ann Tatum testified by affidavit that they never told anyone that they did not want to speak with the media. & Rem.Code Ann. 16-0098 THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS, INC. AND STEVE BLOW, PETITIONERS v. JOHN TATUM They also argue that the column contains only nonactionable rhetorical hyperbole in the course of advocating societal change. We conclude that there was more than a scintilla of evidence showing more than a mere failure to conduct a reasonable investigation. He testified that he knew that Bruce Tomaso and Kevin Sherrington looked into Paul's death, and that he could not remember specifically which of them provided him with the information he used in the column. Contracts

Utilities Law 0. Blow's controversial practice of attacking obituaries. In their affidavits, both Tatums said that they would not have published the obituary as worded if they had known that DMN had someone on staff who had a history of criticizing obituaries like Steve Blow.. We construe an allegedly defamatory publication as a whole in light of the surrounding circumstances and based on how a person of ordinary intelligence would perceive it. The gist is that they stated a false cause of death, shrouded Paul's suicide in secrecy, intended to mislead and deceive the readers, and may have wanted to conceal Paul's mental illness and their own failure to intervene. Turner v. KTRK Television, Inc., 38 S.W.3d 103, 119 (Tex.2000). Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps, 475 U.S. 767, 77576, 106 S.Ct. 29, 2013), aff'd, 41 N.E.3d 38, 473 Mass. In adopting the verifiable as false test in Bentley and Neely, the Texas Supreme Court relied on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1, 110 S.Ct. We agree with the Tatums' second argument and thus do not address their first. Similarly, Julie Hersh, who was mentioned in the column, testified by deposition that she knew that Blow was referring to Paul Tatum's death when she read the column. The Tatums' response relied on the following evidence: One, John Tatum testified by affidavit that his friend Lee Simpson called to inform him about the column the day it was published. Appellees argue that the column is a fair comment on a matter of public concern, specifically society's tendency to avoid open discussion of suicide and how that leaves its dangers underestimated. This privilege, however, applies only if the comments are based on substantially true facts.

Turner, 38 S.W.3d at 114. Prac. at 1019.

Podeli na Fejsbuku. The hypothetical person of ordinary intelligence is one who exercises care and prudence, but not omniscience, when evaluating an allegedly defamatory communication. at 60. We agree with the Tatums on all three points.

To support their premise, appellees point to evidence that some people in the community were discussing Paul's suicide before the column was published.

at 6364. In two appellate issues, the Tatums urge that the trial court erred in granting the summary judgment dismissing their libel and DTPA claims.

See Neely, 418 S.W.3d at 62 ; Bentley, 94 S.W.3d at 57985. Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Tamez, 206 S.W.3d 572, 582 (Tex.2006). Civil Rights See Neely, 418 S.W.3d at 63. Bentley, 94 S.W.3d at 591. We disagree. WebMembers can access the ePaper 24/7 day by going to epaper.dallasnews.com. Id. Appellees also assert that the obituary's omission of Paul's suicide shows that it was in fact a deception. But as discussed above, deception implies intent to deceive, and the Tatums raised a genuine fact issue as to whether they had such an intent. Viewed in the light most favorable to the Tatums, the evidence raised a genuine issue of material fact as to the actual malice element. The trial court granted appellees' amended summary judgment motion, and the Tatums timely filed a notice of appeal. Id. He then called a friend, and their conversation prompted her and her mother to drive to the Tatums' house during the early morning hours of May 18. WebNJDEP, Land Use Regulation, Borough of Madison and Borough of Chatham v. NJDEP and NJ Infrastructure Bank, NJDEP, Solid Waste Compliance and Enforcement v. Classic Cleaning (d/b/a Bio-Clean of New Jersey) and Andrew P. Yurchuck, John and Jane Gibbons v. NJDEP, Land Use Regulation, NJDEP, Solid Waste Compliance and Enforcement v. See DuncanHubert v. Mitchell, 310 S.W.3d 92, 103 (Tex.App.Dallas 2010, pet.

The Dallas Morning News v. Tatum, No. (the undisclosed information must be about the goods or services being rendered). Election Law Blow explained that he acted differently in investigating this column because he had been told that Paul's family did not want to discuss the matter. Id. Slander is an oral defamation. The Tatums' live pleading asserted Libel as count 1 and Libel per se as count 2. Bus. Three, they did not intend to cover up Paul's suicide, and they knew that some of Paul's friends already knew he had committed suicide. See McConnell v. Southside Indep. Government Law

We thus conclude that the Tatums pled claims for both libel per quod and libel per se. 1558, 89 L.Ed.2d 783 (1986). Based on his investigation, he concluded that the primary impact involved in the accident was moderate to severe, and that the accident was severe enough that it would have subjected a human occupant of the vehicle to, at a very minimum, the risk of a mild TBI [traumatic brain injury ], such as a concussion..

This case involves libel, which is a defamation expressed in written or other graphic form. Because we see no matching argument in appellees' amended motion for summary judgment, that argument is not properly before us. 1 of Dallas County, Texas, to: Dana Goodwin. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that they did. WebDallas morning news v. Tatum-the Tatum's son shot and killed himself after suffering serious injuries in a car crash -Moore moved for summary judgement, which was The Tatums submitted evidence showing that: One, their motive in stating that Paul died as a result of injuries sustained in an automobile accident was to express their belief, after investigation, that the best explanation of the underlying cause of Paul's suicide was a brain injury sustained in the auto accident. All service and technical issues must go through our Customer Service Center. Specifically, the first affidavit is by Dr. Robert Cargill, who possesses a Ph.D. in bioengineering. Communications Law 13, 2015, pet. Neely, 418 S.W.3d at 70. Specifically, the Tatums produced evidence that Blow did not contact them to determine the basis for their choice of words in Paul's obituary, and that this failure to contact them was a breach of journalistic standards and the newspaper's own policies. 1558, 89 L.Ed.2d 783 (1986) ; see also Turner, 38 S.W.3d at 116 ; Klentzman v. Brady, 456 S.W.3d 239, 26364 (Tex.App.Houston [1st Dist.] 051400566CV, 486 S.W.3d 7, 2015 WL 1138258 (Tex.App.Dallas Mar. Two, they did not mention suicide in the obituary because (i) they believed it would give a false impression that Paul committed suicide as a result of depression or other mental illness and (ii) they did not feel it would honor Paul's memory to include morbid details about his death or to include overly scientific information. (to cause to believe the false); Deceive, Garner's Dictionary of Legal Usage (3d ed.2011) (to induce someone to believe in a falsehood); Deceive, The New Oxford American Dictionary (2001) (cause (someone) to believe something that is not true, typically in order to gain some personal advantage). 27.001.011. Placing the burden of proving truth or falsity is a complex matter.

73.001. As to whether Blow misrepresented his investigation and the sources of his information, Blow testified by deposition that he learned the information about Paul's death that he used in his column from one of his colleagues at DMN. Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. See Tex.R. Legal Ethics

Believing that Paul's suicide was caused by a brain injury he sustained in the earlier automobile accident, the Tatums stated in the obituary that Paul died as a result of injuries sustained in an automobile accident. The obituary was published on May 21, 2010. In two appellate issues, the Tatums urge that the trial court erred in granting the summary judgment dismissing their Our supreme court, however, has embraced the Milkovich verifiability test. In the present case, the column's implicit assertion that the Tatums committed deception is similaran accusation that the Tatums willfully wrote a misleading obituary for the purpose of deceiving readers, possibly to protect themselves from suspicion of being negligent or inattentive parents. We agree with the Tatums.

Heritage Capital, 436 S.W.3d at 875. About three months later, they filed an amended traditional and no-evidence summary judgment motion.

at 10, 110 S.Ct. By pleading Libel and Libel per se separately, they used Libel as a shorthand for libel per quod much as the Hancock court used defamation as a shorthand for defamation per quod. Heritage Capital, 436 S.W.3d at 875.

In their second appellate issue, the Tatums contend that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment on their DTPA claims against DMN. at 14, at *4. Although appellees contend that the column's gist does not include any comment on the Tatums' character or their actions, we disagree. Rather, this case turns on the verifiability of the column's accusation of deception against the Tatums. The Tatums argue that the service at issue is publishing the obituary. Finally, appellees cite West v. Thomson Newspapers, 872 P.2d 999 (Utah 1994). 12, 2007, pet. 051401318CV.

Texas Supreme Court dismisses defamation lawsuit against The Dallas Morning News John and Mary Ann Tatum, whose 17-year-old son shot himself, sued The And the gist includes an implication that the Tatums' motive for deceiving readers was to conceal that Paul had suffered from a mental illness that the Tatums failed to confront.

The plaintiff must also prove damages unless the defamatory statements are defamatory per se. Constr., L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London, 327 S.W.3d 118, 127 (Tex.2010) (citing dictionaries as aids to interpreting an insurance policy). People who were familiar with the situation understood the column to refer to Paul and his parents. After West's election, Thomson ran columns asserting that before the election West had opposed a proposal that the town should purchase a municipal power system, but that he changed his position after he was elected. A publication's gist is its main point, material part, or essence, as perceived by a reasonable person. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1, 16, 1920 & n.6, 110 S.Ct.

A statement does not have to refer to the plaintiff by name, however, if people who know and are acquainted with the plaintiff reasonably understand from reading the statement that it referred to the plaintiff. Main, 348 S.W.3d at 395 ; see also Houseman v. Publicaciones Paso del Norte, S.A., 242 S.W.3d 518, 525 (Tex.App.El Paso 2007, no pet.)

at 6768. These cases are distinguishable because the case before us does not turn on the verifiability of the column's statement about the cause of Paul's suicide. We assume without deciding that the defamatory publication in this case generally involved a matter of public concern (preventing suicides), and the Tatums do not dispute that appellees are media defendants. at 62 ; McIlvain v. Jacobs, 794 S.W.2d 14, 15 (Tex.1990). The Tatums wrote an obituary for Paul and paid DMN to publish the obituary in the Dallas Morning News newspaper. Smith v. Deneve, 285 S.W.3d 904, 909 (Tex.App.Dallas 2009, no pet.). Antitrust & Trade Regulation Id. 05-14-01017-CV, 2015 WL 9582903, at *5 (Tex.

284, 339 S.W.2d 890, 893 (1960). Appellees, however, cite several cases from other jurisdictions to support their argument that the column's gist is an unverifiable opinion. Judgment entered this 14th day of

You already receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters. Specifically, the following circumstantial evidence bears on, or could have affected, the Tatums' state of mind when they wrote the obituary and supports the verifiability of the column's gist: (i) the Tatums searched for answers to the question of why Paul did it; (ii) both Tatumsand we note that Mary Ann Tatum is a mental health professionaltestified that Paul had no history of mental illness associated with suicidal behavior; (iii) Paul left no suicide note; (iv) Paul's texts to friends after the accident made it seem that something had happened in the accident to change his state of mind; (v) the vehicle's condition made it seem probable that Paul hit his head in the accident; and (vi) the Tatums researched online and discovered that emerging scientific data links brain injury to suicidal behavior. Turner, 38 S.W.3d at 114. Appellees won a take-nothing summary judgment. The Tatums purchased a space in the Dallas Morning News to publish an obituary for their son.

Courthouse News brings us this lawsuit filed two days ago in Dallas County District Court: John Tatum and Mary Ann Tatum v. The Dallas Morning News, inc. and Steve Blow. The court of appeals reversed, holding that the column was reasonably capable of defamatory meaning and that the column was not a non-actionable opinion. Appellees further argue that the column does not omit or juxtapose facts in such a way as to make its gist false.

of Tex., Inc. v. Tex. The Tatums' first appellate issue argues that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment on their libel claims. In addition to their libel claims, the Tatums also asserted DTPA claims against DMN. We therefore do not address whether those categories apply here.

Bluegrass Yacht And Country Club Membership Cost, How To Add Space Between Two Labels In Html, Tropico 5 Depression Choice, Plead Especially For Money Crossword Clue 2 3,2 4, Rod Mcmahon Net Worth, Articles D